Skip to main content
UBSW.EU

Contact

Contact UBSW.EU

Corrections, vendor access and questions about the directory all go to one address. Corrections that arrive with the source page and the date it was read can usually be applied in a single pass.

No account is required. Messages go to [email protected].

Correct entry information

Correct an entry

Vendors, buyers and researchers can correct any fact in the directory or dispute any score. A correction supported by a vendor-published page is applied and dated on the entry; one that is not supported is answered with the evidence already cited.

What to include

  1. The URL of the entry, for example /tools/ethicontrol.
  2. The field that is wrong: pricing, hosting, a capability or a certification.
  3. The correct value, quoted from the vendor's own page where possible.
  4. The vendor page that shows it, as a direct link.
  5. The date you read that page.

The same rules apply to a disputed score: a score is an assessment against a fixed rubric, so it changes when the evidence changes, not when the weighting is disagreed with. The two outcomes that matter most are set out under disputing a score.

Ready to send

Email a correction

The message opens with the fields above already listed, so the request can be checked against the entry without a follow-up round.

Sent to [email protected] · no account required

Disputing a score

A criterion scores zero because nothing is published

Publish the fact, or send the page that already contains it. The entry is re-dated, the criterion is re-scored and the total is updated. Criteria that were unverifiable at the recorded review scope are marked as such rather than described as failures.

The review scope is too narrow

Almost every platform is scored from public sources alone, because the product sits behind a demo gate. A vendor can widen its own review scope at no cost by granting access to the reporter side, the handler environment, or both. The entry is re-scored and republished.

Email us

What else the address handles

One inbox for everything below. Choose the message that matches, and include the entry or category it refers to.

Facts and scores

Corrections and disputes

A fact is wrong, a capability has changed, or a score looks inconsistent with the pages cited on the entry.

Email a correction

For vendors

Widen the review scope

Almost every platform is scored from public sources alone. Access to the reporter side or the handler environment widens the scope at no cost.

Offer access

Coverage

Suggest a category

Categories are researched in a published order. A clear buyer question and the products that belong in it make a suggestion usable.

Propose a category

Anything else, whether a question about how a rating is calculated, a broken link or a request to be notified when a category goes live, can go to the same address: [email protected].

What the address will not do

The limits are part of the offer, not fine print.
  • Remove a listing because a vendor would prefer not to be compared. Entries are records of published facts; a vendor can correct the facts but not the existence of the record.
  • Change a score without a change in evidence. Weighting arguments are answered, but the rubric is not reweighted to move one platform.
  • Accept a marketing claim as a certificate. A certification entry needs a certificate, its scope and its validity dates, or it is recorded as a vendor claim.
  • Add a vendor, a position or a badge for payment. There is no paid placement and no affiliate revenue on this site.
  • Give legal or procurement advice. The directory records what vendors publish; it does not certify compliance.