01
Facts come from the vendor
Profiles link directly to the vendor pages behind each price, hosting statement and product capability.
How evidence is recordedUBSW.EU / Ethics and compliance tools
Compare ethics and compliance, AI governance and supply-chain due diligence platforms on the facts each vendor publishes. Every profile links back to the sources it records.
New category · AI governance
Eight tools, scored against the same 25 criteria. Open the evidence behind each score and see where public product information leaves unanswered questions.
Start with a requirement
The vendor names an EU country where report data is stored.
8 of 15 platforms qualify
An entry price appears on the vendor's own website.
4 of 15 platforms qualify
You can open an account and evaluate the product yourself.
2 of 15 platforms qualify
A current ISO 27001 certificate is published, with scope stated.
12 of 15 platforms qualify
Conflicts declarations are collected, reviewed and retained in the product.
3 of 15 platforms qualify
Gifts, hospitality and entertainment are declared and approved in the product.
2 of 15 platforms qualify
Platform directory
Ethics and compliance
Lake Oswego, Oregon, United States 60 languages
EthicsPoint hotline and WhistleB speak-up products inside the NAVEX One governance, risk and compliance suite.
Ethics and compliance
Atlanta, Georgia, United States Languages not published
Ethics and compliance module inside the OneTrust privacy, security and GRC platform, covering speak-up intake, case management and disclosures.
Ethics and compliance
Munich, Germany 80 languages
Whistleblowing module of the EQS Compliance COCKPIT, sold with published country-level starting prices.
Directory coverage
Reporting, investigations and the systems that support an ethics programme.
15 platforms listed
Open categorySee what AI is in use, who is accountable, and how risk is managed.
8 platforms listed
Open categorySupplier records, grievances and the evidence a due-diligence statement rests on.
9 platforms listed
Open categoryHow UBSW.EU works
01
Profiles link directly to the vendor pages behind each price, hosting statement and product capability.
How evidence is recorded02
When a vendor does not publish an answer, the directory marks it as unpublished instead of filling the gap with a guess.
Read the scoring rules03
Vendors cannot pay for placement. They can submit corrections, which are checked against a source and dated.
Submit a correctionThere is no single best. Fifteen platforms are scored against the same 25 questions, so the top of the list reflects documented intake, case handling, deadlines, security and pricing. Decide which requirements you cannot move on first, then compare the platforms that survive them.
The EU hosting shortlist separates platforms that name an EU country for report storage from those that offer an EU region without naming a country, and from those that host outside the EU. A named country is the fact procurement teams can check against a sub-processor list.
The published pricing shortlist lists every platform in this category with a starting price on its own site. Most ethics platforms quote per deal, so a published figure is the quickest sign that a product can be compared before a sales call.
Published starting points in this category run from about 29 € to 99 € per month for a reporting channel, with audit logs and single sign-on often reserved for higher plans. A full ethics programme with conflicts and gifts registers is usually quoted rather than priced.
Directive 2019/1937, transposed into national law in each member state. It sets confidential intake, an acknowledgment within seven days and feedback within three months, plus protection against retaliation. National laws add requirements, and several member states go further on anonymity and external reporting.
A channel answers the reporting duty. Ethics software adds the records an ethics programme needs, such as conflicts declarations, gifts registers, policy attestation and training. Many platforms sell only the channel, which is why the directory scores the two separately.
The AI governance category scores eight platforms on 25 questions, including AI Act mapping, risk classification, human oversight and post-deployment monitoring. Each profile shows which criteria were documented and which were not found in the reviewed pages.
The supply-chain due diligence category scores nine platforms against 25 questions that include supplier and site records, risk assessment, grievances, evidence and reporting, and mapping to CSDDD, CSRD/ESRS, EUDR and forced-labour obligations. Each profile lists the vendor pages reviewed.
Yes. No vendor pays for a listing, a position or a score, there is no affiliate revenue, and outbound links only carry a utm_source parameter for traffic attribution. Any vendor can challenge a fact or a score, and every accepted change is dated on the entry.