4 points
The reviewed vendor pages clearly document the capability.
AI governance · Rank 07
ModelOp Center
Enterprise AI system of record with intake, risk tiering, lifecycle tracking and evidence collection.
100 points across 25 criteria · public vendor evidence
Profile overview
At a glance
Category
AI governance
Evidence
Public vendor pages
Not found
2 of 25 criteria
Reviewed
13 November 2026
25 criteria · 100 points
Criterion-by-criterion
Each criterion is worth four points: 4 when the reviewed pages clearly document it, 2 for narrower or partial evidence, and 0 when the vendor says it is absent or no supporting statement was found. “Not found” is marked separately from an explicit absence.
IInventory and scope18 / 20
I1Central AI system inventoryA searchable register of AI systems or use cases.Documented4/4
I2Third-party AI includedVendor, embedded or externally supplied AI can be recorded.Documented4/4
I3Discovery beyond manual entryA documented way to discover AI in the organisation or connect discovery sources.Partially documented2/4
I4Purpose and ownership recordedA use case can be tied to its purpose and accountable people or teams.Documented4/4
I5Generative AI and agents coveredThe published product scope explicitly includes generative AI, agents or both.Documented4/4
RRisk and regulation12 / 20
R1Risk assessment and classificationA documented workflow assesses or classifies AI use cases by risk.Documented4/4
R2EU AI Act mappingA product workflow, template or controls are expressly mapped to the EU AI Act.Partially documented2/4
R3More than one governance frameworkThe product maps controls to additional frameworks such as ISO/IEC 42001 or NIST AI RMF.Partially documented2/4
R4Impact assessment workflowA documented impact or fundamental-rights assessment is available.Not found in reviewed pages0/4
R5Responsibilities and stakeholdersThe workflow assigns or routes review across accountable functions or stakeholders.Documented4/4
CControls and workflow16 / 20
W1Structured intakeNew AI use cases enter through a documented request or intake workflow.Documented4/4
W2Approval gatesReviews or approvals can be required before deployment or material changes.Documented4/4
W3Role-based governanceThe product documents differentiated roles or access for governance work.Partially documented2/4
W4Human oversight recordedHuman oversight responsibilities or checkpoints can be documented in the workflow.Partially documented2/4
W5Policies become controlsPolicies or regulatory requirements map to trackable controls or actions.Documented4/4
EEvidence and records20 / 20
E1Technical evidence and documentationThe product records or manages technical documentation and supporting evidence.Documented4/4
E2System relationships and lineageLinks between systems, models, data, vendors or dependencies can be represented.Documented4/4
E3Traceable review historyActions, changes or reviews have a documented history or audit trail.Documented4/4
E4Governance reportingA governance report, factsheet or evidence export is documented.Documented4/4
E5Evidence tied to controlsEvidence, sign-offs or validation results can be attached to governance requirements.Documented4/4
LLifecycle assurance10 / 20
L1Post-deployment monitoringMonitoring continues after deployment, beyond a one-time approval.Partially documented2/4
L2Performance and responsible-AI testingTesting or monitoring includes quality, fairness, bias, robustness or drift.Partially documented2/4
L3Incident or issue follow-upDetected issues can trigger a documented response, workflow or remediation.Partially documented2/4
L4Runtime controlsThe product documents guardrails or controls that can act during AI use.Not found in reviewed pages0/4
L5Periodic review and changeThe product documents reassessment, review intervals or lifecycle change handling.Documented4/4
Evidence trail
Vendor pages reviewed
Only public vendor product pages and documentation were reviewed. Sales demos, contracts and security packs were not examined. Features can vary by plan, region and configuration.
Method
How this score is produced
The score measures the coverage of a vendor’s public evidence against a common feature rubric. It does not certify that the product meets the AI Act or that a workflow works in practice.
2 points
Public evidence describes a narrower or partial version of the criterion.
0 points
The vendor explicitly says it is absent, or no supporting evidence was found. “Not found” is flagged separately.
Category scope, inclusion rules and sources are documented on AI governance.