Skip to main content
UBSW.EU

25 questions · 100 points

How supply-chain due diligence tools are scored

Twenty-five questions across supplier records, risk assessment, grievances, evidence and oversight. Each entry is scored from the vendor's public product and documentation pages, against the same set.

Rubric edition 2026.11 · recalculated 13 November 2026 · 9 entries

Facts first, score second

Each entry carries two kinds of information. Keeping them apart is what makes the score checkable.

The entry records

What a vendor says about its own product, taken from a named page and stamped with the date it was read. Where a vendor publishes nothing, the entry says "not published". That is a finding in its own right.

The score judges

How much of these 25 questions the recorded facts support. A product can be strong and still score low, because strong products often publish little. The breakdown shows which answers were found, which were partial and which were missing.

How points are awarded

Each question scores 0, 2 or 4. 25 questions put the maximum at 100 points. A published "no" and a missing answer both add 0, but the breakdown marks them differently.

4 points

The vendor's pages describe the capability clearly, not just in a logo or a slogan.

2 points

The pages describe a narrower or partial version of the capability.

0 points

The vendor says it is absent, the offer does not meet the question, or no supporting page was found. Only the last case is flagged as missing.

The questions

The standard beside each question is the one applied to every platform in the category, so any total can be recomputed by hand.

Supplier and site records5 questions, 20 points

IDQuestionWhat earns the points
A1Supplier registerA searchable supplier inventory with owners and contacts.
A2Site and facility recordsProduction sites or facilities can be recorded under a supplier.
A3Upstream tiersSuppliers beyond the direct tier can be mapped.
A4Spend or category segmentationSuppliers can be segmented by spend, category or material.
A5Supplier onboardingNew suppliers enter through a documented onboarding and data request.

Risk assessment5 questions, 20 points

IDQuestionWhat earns the points
B1Human-rights risk screeningSuppliers are screened against labour and human-rights risk.
B2Environmental risk screeningSuppliers are screened against environmental and climate risk.
B3Country and sector contextRisk is informed by country, sector or commodity data.
B4Documented severity methodHow likelihood and severity are scored is published or configurable.
B5Prioritisation and next actionResults are ranked and paired with a recommended action.

Grievances and remediation5 questions, 20 points

IDQuestionWhat earns the points
C1Grievance intakeWorkers or third parties can raise a complaint against a supplier.
C2Anonymous channelA complaint can be submitted anonymously.
C3Case workflow and deadlinesCases have status, ownership and response timers.
C4Corrective action plansFindings become tracked corrective actions with owners.
C5Closure evidenceClosure requires evidence that the issue was remedied.

Evidence and reporting5 questions, 20 points

IDQuestionWhat earns the points
D1Document collectionCertificates and policies are collected with expiry dates.
D2Supplier questionnairesStandard assessments or self-assessments can be issued.
D3Audit managementAudits can be commissioned, recorded and linked to findings.
D4Statement and report exportA due-diligence statement or report can be produced.
D5Audit trailChanges and evidence carry a traceable history.

Controls and oversight5 questions, 20 points

IDQuestionWhat earns the points
E1Regulatory mappingOutputs map to CSDDD, EUDR, forced labour or national laws.
E2Continuous monitoringSuppliers are monitored between assessments.
E3Integrations and APIData moves to or from procurement, ERP or other systems.
E4Security and trust pageCertifications or a public trust page are published.
E5AI disclosureThe role of AI in the product is documented.

What we could review

An answer is only as good as the access behind it.

Public sources for every entry

All 9 entries in this category were scored from the vendor's public product and documentation pages. No demo, contract or security pack was examined, so the score records published evidence only.

What is not scored

A rubric is defined by its exclusions too. These were considered and left out because they separate nothing between these products.
  • Carbon accounting and emissions factors: a climate tool is not a due-diligence record.
  • Sanctions screening without a supplier record or workflow.
  • Consulting, audits and legal advice with no software product.

Editions

Two scores are only comparable when they come from the same edition of the same rubric.

Edition 2026.11 · 13 November 2026

First published edition. Twenty-five questions across five areas, four points each, scoped to CSDDD, CSRD/ESRS, EUDR and forced-labour obligations.