9 rated platforms

Supply-chain due diligence software, rated on published evidence

Compare software for supplier records, risk assessment, grievances and the evidence behind a due-diligence statement. Scores show what each vendor documents publicly against the same 25 questions; they are not a compliance verdict or a hands-on product test.

See the ratings Legal basis

25 questions · maximum 100 points · reviewed 13 November 2026

Category scope

What this category covers

Supply-chain due diligence is no longer a single report. It is a running record: which suppliers and sites are in scope, what risk each carries, which grievances arrived, what was fixed and what evidence supports the claim. This category covers the products that hold that record and connect it to the obligations in CSDDD, CSRD/ESRS, the EU Deforestation Regulation and the Forced Labour Regulation.

Included

Supplier, site and upstream-tier inventories with ownership and country of operation
Risk screening and severity assessment against human-rights and environmental standards
Grievance and complaint mechanisms, including anonymous intake and remediation tracking
Corrective action plans, deadlines and evidence of closure
Questionnaires, document collection and supplier attestations with expiry dates
Statement and disclosure reporting, with an exportable audit trail

Not included

Sanctions and adverse-media screening sold without a supplier record or workflow
Carbon accounting and emissions reporting without a due-diligence case record
Consulting, audits and legal advice with no software product
Single-commodity traceability without supplier risk or grievance handling

What buyers are deciding

Can we show, supplier by supplier, how a risk was identified and what was done about it?
Does the product keep grievances and remediation in the same record as the supplier assessment?
Can a supplier answer once and have that evidence reused across obligations?
Would the output survive an auditor, a regulator or a court, with dates and an audit trail?
Does the tool cover the commodities and countries where our exposure actually sits?
Can we export a statement without rebuilding it by hand in a spreadsheet?

Legal basis

The obligations behind these ratings

A due-diligence product is only useful if it maps to the rules its buyers answer to. These are the obligations the questions are scoped against, with the dates as currently published.

Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive

Directive 2024/1760 entered into force on 25 July 2024 and was amended by the Omnibus I package in 2025 and 2026. It now covers EU companies with at least 5,000 employees and 1.5 billion euro net worldwide turnover, and non-EU companies with 1.5 billion euro net turnover in the EU. National transposition measures are due by 26 July 2028 and apply from 26 July 2029, with the reporting duty applying to financial years starting on or after 1 January 2030. Penalties reach 3% of net worldwide turnover.

Official source

EU Deforestation Regulation

Regulation 2023/1115 has been in force since 29 June 2023. Operators and traders placing cattle, cocoa, coffee, oil palm, rubber, soya and wood products on the EU market must show that the products are deforestation-free against a 31 December 2020 cut-off, legally produced, and covered by a due-diligence statement with plot geolocation. Medium and large operators must apply it from 30 December 2026, and micro and small enterprises from 30 June 2027.

Official source

CSRD and the European Sustainability Reporting Standards

Directive 2022/2464 requires companies in scope to report under the ESRS, including value-chain information and the due-diligence policies, actions and targets behind it. The Commission adopted simplified reporting standards in July 2026, so the disclosure a supplier questionnaire feeds into is still moving.

Official source

Forced Labour Regulation

Regulation (EU) 2024/3015 bans products made with forced labour from the EU market and gives the Commission powers to investigate supply chains and order withdrawals. The supplier evidence a company collects for due diligence is the evidence it needs if a product is investigated.

Official source

National due-diligence laws

Several European countries legislated before the Directive, including France's devoir de vigilance (2017), Germany's Lieferkettensorgfaltspflichtengesetz (2023) and Norway's Transparency Act (2022). The EU rules are intended to replace this patchwork as they apply, but companies operating across borders still meet different reporting expectations in the meantime.

Public evidence review

Ratings and source pages

Each score is calculated from vendor-published product and documentation pages. Open a platform to see every criterion result and the pages reviewed for that entry.

Rank 01

osapiens HUB

Mannheim, Germany

80 / 100

Public evidence score

Supplier intelligence, product compliance and disclosure modules on one shared data layer, with dedicated workflows for EUDR, CSDDD and LkSG.

Official website ↗

3 criteria not found in reviewed pages · sources reviewed 13 November 2026

SSupplier and site records16 / 20

A1Supplier registerA searchable supplier inventory with owners and contacts.Documented4/4

A2Site and facility recordsProduction sites or facilities can be recorded under a supplier.Partially documented2/4

A3Upstream tiersSuppliers beyond the direct tier can be mapped.Documented4/4

A4Spend or category segmentationSuppliers can be segmented by spend, category or material.Partially documented2/4

A5Supplier onboardingNew suppliers enter through a documented onboarding and data request.Documented4/4

RRisk assessment18 / 20

B1Human-rights risk screeningSuppliers are screened against labour and human-rights risk.Documented4/4

B2Environmental risk screeningSuppliers are screened against environmental and climate risk.Documented4/4

B3Country and sector contextRisk is informed by country, sector or commodity data.Documented4/4

B4Documented severity methodHow likelihood and severity are scored is published or configurable.Partially documented2/4

B5Prioritisation and next actionResults are ranked and paired with a recommended action.Documented4/4

GGrievances and remediation6 / 20

C1Grievance intakeWorkers or third parties can raise a complaint against a supplier.Not found in reviewed pages0/4

C2Anonymous channelA complaint can be submitted anonymously.Not found in reviewed pages0/4

C3Case workflow and deadlinesCases have status, ownership and response timers.Not found in reviewed pages0/4

C4Corrective action plansFindings become tracked corrective actions with owners.Documented4/4

C5Closure evidenceClosure requires evidence that the issue was remedied.Partially documented2/4

EEvidence and reporting20 / 20

D1Document collectionCertificates and policies are collected with expiry dates.Documented4/4

D2Supplier questionnairesStandard assessments or self-assessments can be issued.Documented4/4

D3Audit managementAudits can be commissioned, recorded and linked to findings.Documented4/4

D4Statement and report exportA due-diligence statement or report can be produced.Documented4/4

D5Audit trailChanges and evidence carry a traceable history.Documented4/4

CControls and oversight20 / 20

E1Regulatory mappingOutputs map to CSDDD, EUDR, forced labour or national laws.Documented4/4

E2Continuous monitoringSuppliers are monitored between assessments.Documented4/4

E3Integrations and APIData moves to or from procurement, ERP or other systems.Documented4/4

E4Security and trust pageCertifications or a public trust page are published.Documented4/4

E5AI disclosureThe role of AI in the product is documented.Documented4/4

Vendor pages reviewed

Open the full profile

Rank 02

Sedex

London, United Kingdom

78 / 100

Public evidence score

Supplier data platform built around SMETA social audits, with site-level risk scoring, corrective actions and regulator-facing reports.

Official website ↗

2 criteria not found in reviewed pages · sources reviewed 13 November 2026

SSupplier and site records18 / 20

A1Supplier registerA searchable supplier inventory with owners and contacts.Documented4/4

A2Site and facility recordsProduction sites or facilities can be recorded under a supplier.Documented4/4

A3Upstream tiersSuppliers beyond the direct tier can be mapped.Documented4/4

A4Spend or category segmentationSuppliers can be segmented by spend, category or material.Partially documented2/4

A5Supplier onboardingNew suppliers enter through a documented onboarding and data request.Documented4/4

RRisk assessment16 / 20

B1Human-rights risk screeningSuppliers are screened against labour and human-rights risk.Documented4/4

B2Environmental risk screeningSuppliers are screened against environmental and climate risk.Partially documented2/4

B3Country and sector contextRisk is informed by country, sector or commodity data.Documented4/4

B4Documented severity methodHow likelihood and severity are scored is published or configurable.Partially documented2/4

B5Prioritisation and next actionResults are ranked and paired with a recommended action.Documented4/4

GGrievances and remediation12 / 20

C1Grievance intakeWorkers or third parties can raise a complaint against a supplier.Partially documented2/4

C2Anonymous channelA complaint can be submitted anonymously.Not found in reviewed pages0/4

C3Case workflow and deadlinesCases have status, ownership and response timers.Partially documented2/4

C4Corrective action plansFindings become tracked corrective actions with owners.Documented4/4

C5Closure evidenceClosure requires evidence that the issue was remedied.Documented4/4

EEvidence and reporting18 / 20

D1Document collectionCertificates and policies are collected with expiry dates.Documented4/4

D2Supplier questionnairesStandard assessments or self-assessments can be issued.Documented4/4

D3Audit managementAudits can be commissioned, recorded and linked to findings.Documented4/4

D4Statement and report exportA due-diligence statement or report can be produced.Documented4/4

D5Audit trailChanges and evidence carry a traceable history.Partially documented2/4

CControls and oversight14 / 20

E1Regulatory mappingOutputs map to CSDDD, EUDR, forced labour or national laws.Documented4/4

E2Continuous monitoringSuppliers are monitored between assessments.Partially documented2/4

E3Integrations and APIData moves to or from procurement, ERP or other systems.Documented4/4

E4Security and trust pageCertifications or a public trust page are published.Documented4/4

E5AI disclosureThe role of AI in the product is documented.Not found in reviewed pages0/4

Vendor pages reviewed

Open the full profile

Rank 03

IntegrityNext

Munich, Germany

74 / 100

Public evidence score

Supply-chain sustainability platform for supplier assessment, multi-tier visibility and product compliance across CSDDD, LkSG, EUDR and forced-labour rules.

Official website ↗

3 criteria not found in reviewed pages · sources reviewed 13 November 2026

SSupplier and site records16 / 20

A1Supplier registerA searchable supplier inventory with owners and contacts.Documented4/4

A2Site and facility recordsProduction sites or facilities can be recorded under a supplier.Partially documented2/4

A3Upstream tiersSuppliers beyond the direct tier can be mapped.Documented4/4

A4Spend or category segmentationSuppliers can be segmented by spend, category or material.Partially documented2/4

A5Supplier onboardingNew suppliers enter through a documented onboarding and data request.Documented4/4

RRisk assessment18 / 20

B1Human-rights risk screeningSuppliers are screened against labour and human-rights risk.Documented4/4

B2Environmental risk screeningSuppliers are screened against environmental and climate risk.Documented4/4

B3Country and sector contextRisk is informed by country, sector or commodity data.Documented4/4

B4Documented severity methodHow likelihood and severity are scored is published or configurable.Partially documented2/4

B5Prioritisation and next actionResults are ranked and paired with a recommended action.Documented4/4

GGrievances and remediation6 / 20

C1Grievance intakeWorkers or third parties can raise a complaint against a supplier.Not found in reviewed pages0/4

C2Anonymous channelA complaint can be submitted anonymously.Not found in reviewed pages0/4

C3Case workflow and deadlinesCases have status, ownership and response timers.Not found in reviewed pages0/4

C4Corrective action plansFindings become tracked corrective actions with owners.Documented4/4

C5Closure evidenceClosure requires evidence that the issue was remedied.Partially documented2/4

EEvidence and reporting16 / 20

D1Document collectionCertificates and policies are collected with expiry dates.Documented4/4

D2Supplier questionnairesStandard assessments or self-assessments can be issued.Documented4/4

D3Audit managementAudits can be commissioned, recorded and linked to findings.Partially documented2/4

D4Statement and report exportA due-diligence statement or report can be produced.Documented4/4

D5Audit trailChanges and evidence carry a traceable history.Partially documented2/4

CControls and oversight18 / 20

E1Regulatory mappingOutputs map to CSDDD, EUDR, forced labour or national laws.Documented4/4

E2Continuous monitoringSuppliers are monitored between assessments.Documented4/4

E3Integrations and APIData moves to or from procurement, ERP or other systems.Documented4/4

E4Security and trust pageCertifications or a public trust page are published.Partially documented2/4

E5AI disclosureThe role of AI in the product is documented.Documented4/4

Vendor pages reviewed

Open the full profile

Rank 04

EcoVadis

Paris, France

72 / 100

Public evidence score

Analyst-verified supplier sustainability ratings, risk mapping and questionnaires, with worker-voice channels through Ulula.

Official website ↗

1 criteria not found in reviewed pages · sources reviewed 13 November 2026

SSupplier and site records14 / 20

A1Supplier registerA searchable supplier inventory with owners and contacts.Documented4/4

A2Site and facility recordsProduction sites or facilities can be recorded under a supplier.Partially documented2/4

A3Upstream tiersSuppliers beyond the direct tier can be mapped.Partially documented2/4

A4Spend or category segmentationSuppliers can be segmented by spend, category or material.Partially documented2/4

A5Supplier onboardingNew suppliers enter through a documented onboarding and data request.Documented4/4

RRisk assessment18 / 20

B1Human-rights risk screeningSuppliers are screened against labour and human-rights risk.Documented4/4

B2Environmental risk screeningSuppliers are screened against environmental and climate risk.Documented4/4

B3Country and sector contextRisk is informed by country, sector or commodity data.Documented4/4

B4Documented severity methodHow likelihood and severity are scored is published or configurable.Partially documented2/4

B5Prioritisation and next actionResults are ranked and paired with a recommended action.Documented4/4

GGrievances and remediation10 / 20

C1Grievance intakeWorkers or third parties can raise a complaint against a supplier.Partially documented2/4

C2Anonymous channelA complaint can be submitted anonymously.Partially documented2/4

C3Case workflow and deadlinesCases have status, ownership and response timers.Not found in reviewed pages0/4

C4Corrective action plansFindings become tracked corrective actions with owners.Documented4/4

C5Closure evidenceClosure requires evidence that the issue was remedied.Partially documented2/4

EEvidence and reporting14 / 20

D1Document collectionCertificates and policies are collected with expiry dates.Documented4/4

D2Supplier questionnairesStandard assessments or self-assessments can be issued.Documented4/4

D3Audit managementAudits can be commissioned, recorded and linked to findings.Partially documented2/4

D4Statement and report exportA due-diligence statement or report can be produced.Partially documented2/4

D5Audit trailChanges and evidence carry a traceable history.Partially documented2/4

CControls and oversight16 / 20

E1Regulatory mappingOutputs map to CSDDD, EUDR, forced labour or national laws.Documented4/4

E2Continuous monitoringSuppliers are monitored between assessments.Partially documented2/4

E3Integrations and APIData moves to or from procurement, ERP or other systems.Partially documented2/4

E4Security and trust pageCertifications or a public trust page are published.Documented4/4

E5AI disclosureThe role of AI in the product is documented.Documented4/4

Vendor pages reviewed

Open the full profile

Rank 05

Sourcemap

New York, United States

72 / 100

Public evidence score

Bill-of-materials and transaction-level supply chain mapping with verified supplier data, EUDR filing and forced-labour watchlist screening.

Official website ↗

3 criteria not found in reviewed pages · sources reviewed 13 November 2026

SSupplier and site records18 / 20

A1Supplier registerA searchable supplier inventory with owners and contacts.Documented4/4

A2Site and facility recordsProduction sites or facilities can be recorded under a supplier.Documented4/4

A3Upstream tiersSuppliers beyond the direct tier can be mapped.Documented4/4

A4Spend or category segmentationSuppliers can be segmented by spend, category or material.Partially documented2/4

A5Supplier onboardingNew suppliers enter through a documented onboarding and data request.Documented4/4

RRisk assessment14 / 20

B1Human-rights risk screeningSuppliers are screened against labour and human-rights risk.Documented4/4

B2Environmental risk screeningSuppliers are screened against environmental and climate risk.Partially documented2/4

B3Country and sector contextRisk is informed by country, sector or commodity data.Documented4/4

B4Documented severity methodHow likelihood and severity are scored is published or configurable.Partially documented2/4

B5Prioritisation and next actionResults are ranked and paired with a recommended action.Partially documented2/4

GGrievances and remediation4 / 20

C1Grievance intakeWorkers or third parties can raise a complaint against a supplier.Not found in reviewed pages0/4

C2Anonymous channelA complaint can be submitted anonymously.Not found in reviewed pages0/4

C3Case workflow and deadlinesCases have status, ownership and response timers.Not found in reviewed pages0/4

C4Corrective action plansFindings become tracked corrective actions with owners.Partially documented2/4

C5Closure evidenceClosure requires evidence that the issue was remedied.Partially documented2/4

EEvidence and reporting18 / 20

D1Document collectionCertificates and policies are collected with expiry dates.Documented4/4

D2Supplier questionnairesStandard assessments or self-assessments can be issued.Documented4/4

D3Audit managementAudits can be commissioned, recorded and linked to findings.Partially documented2/4

D4Statement and report exportA due-diligence statement or report can be produced.Documented4/4

D5Audit trailChanges and evidence carry a traceable history.Documented4/4

CControls and oversight18 / 20

E1Regulatory mappingOutputs map to CSDDD, EUDR, forced labour or national laws.Documented4/4

E2Continuous monitoringSuppliers are monitored between assessments.Documented4/4

E3Integrations and APIData moves to or from procurement, ERP or other systems.Documented4/4

E4Security and trust pageCertifications or a public trust page are published.Partially documented2/4

E5AI disclosureThe role of AI in the product is documented.Documented4/4

Vendor pages reviewed

Open the full profile

Rank 06

Achilles

Edinburgh, United Kingdom

64 / 100

Public evidence score

Supplier verification and audit network with independent desk and site audits, continuous risk monitoring and contractor and site compliance.

Official website ↗

3 criteria not found in reviewed pages · sources reviewed 13 November 2026

SSupplier and site records16 / 20

A1Supplier registerA searchable supplier inventory with owners and contacts.Documented4/4

A2Site and facility recordsProduction sites or facilities can be recorded under a supplier.Documented4/4

A3Upstream tiersSuppliers beyond the direct tier can be mapped.Partially documented2/4

A4Spend or category segmentationSuppliers can be segmented by spend, category or material.Partially documented2/4

A5Supplier onboardingNew suppliers enter through a documented onboarding and data request.Documented4/4

RRisk assessment14 / 20

B1Human-rights risk screeningSuppliers are screened against labour and human-rights risk.Partially documented2/4

B2Environmental risk screeningSuppliers are screened against environmental and climate risk.Partially documented2/4

B3Country and sector contextRisk is informed by country, sector or commodity data.Documented4/4

B4Documented severity methodHow likelihood and severity are scored is published or configurable.Partially documented2/4

B5Prioritisation and next actionResults are ranked and paired with a recommended action.Documented4/4

GGrievances and remediation4 / 20

C1Grievance intakeWorkers or third parties can raise a complaint against a supplier.Not found in reviewed pages0/4

C2Anonymous channelA complaint can be submitted anonymously.Not found in reviewed pages0/4

C3Case workflow and deadlinesCases have status, ownership and response timers.Not found in reviewed pages0/4

C4Corrective action plansFindings become tracked corrective actions with owners.Partially documented2/4

C5Closure evidenceClosure requires evidence that the issue was remedied.Partially documented2/4

EEvidence and reporting16 / 20

D1Document collectionCertificates and policies are collected with expiry dates.Documented4/4

D2Supplier questionnairesStandard assessments or self-assessments can be issued.Documented4/4

D3Audit managementAudits can be commissioned, recorded and linked to findings.Documented4/4

D4Statement and report exportA due-diligence statement or report can be produced.Partially documented2/4

D5Audit trailChanges and evidence carry a traceable history.Partially documented2/4

CControls and oversight14 / 20

E1Regulatory mappingOutputs map to CSDDD, EUDR, forced labour or national laws.Partially documented2/4

E2Continuous monitoringSuppliers are monitored between assessments.Documented4/4

E3Integrations and APIData moves to or from procurement, ERP or other systems.Partially documented2/4

E4Security and trust pageCertifications or a public trust page are published.Partially documented2/4

E5AI disclosureThe role of AI in the product is documented.Documented4/4

Vendor pages reviewed

Open the full profile

Rank 07

Worldly

San Francisco, United States

64 / 100

Public evidence score

Facility-level environmental and social assessments through the Higg Index, with supplier compliance management, audits, remediation tracking and regulatory outputs.

Official website ↗

3 criteria not found in reviewed pages · sources reviewed 13 November 2026

SSupplier and site records16 / 20

A1Supplier registerA searchable supplier inventory with owners and contacts.Documented4/4

A2Site and facility recordsProduction sites or facilities can be recorded under a supplier.Documented4/4

A3Upstream tiersSuppliers beyond the direct tier can be mapped.Partially documented2/4

A4Spend or category segmentationSuppliers can be segmented by spend, category or material.Partially documented2/4

A5Supplier onboardingNew suppliers enter through a documented onboarding and data request.Documented4/4

RRisk assessment12 / 20

B1Human-rights risk screeningSuppliers are screened against labour and human-rights risk.Partially documented2/4

B2Environmental risk screeningSuppliers are screened against environmental and climate risk.Documented4/4

B3Country and sector contextRisk is informed by country, sector or commodity data.Partially documented2/4

B4Documented severity methodHow likelihood and severity are scored is published or configurable.Partially documented2/4

B5Prioritisation and next actionResults are ranked and paired with a recommended action.Partially documented2/4

GGrievances and remediation6 / 20

C1Grievance intakeWorkers or third parties can raise a complaint against a supplier.Not found in reviewed pages0/4

C2Anonymous channelA complaint can be submitted anonymously.Not found in reviewed pages0/4

C3Case workflow and deadlinesCases have status, ownership and response timers.Not found in reviewed pages0/4

C4Corrective action plansFindings become tracked corrective actions with owners.Documented4/4

C5Closure evidenceClosure requires evidence that the issue was remedied.Partially documented2/4

EEvidence and reporting16 / 20

D1Document collectionCertificates and policies are collected with expiry dates.Documented4/4

D2Supplier questionnairesStandard assessments or self-assessments can be issued.Documented4/4

D3Audit managementAudits can be commissioned, recorded and linked to findings.Documented4/4

D4Statement and report exportA due-diligence statement or report can be produced.Partially documented2/4

D5Audit trailChanges and evidence carry a traceable history.Partially documented2/4

CControls and oversight14 / 20

E1Regulatory mappingOutputs map to CSDDD, EUDR, forced labour or national laws.Partially documented2/4

E2Continuous monitoringSuppliers are monitored between assessments.Partially documented2/4

E3Integrations and APIData moves to or from procurement, ERP or other systems.Partially documented2/4

E4Security and trust pageCertifications or a public trust page are published.Documented4/4

E5AI disclosureThe role of AI in the product is documented.Documented4/4

Vendor pages reviewed

Open the full profile

Rank 08

Sphera Supply Chain Risk Management

Chicago, United States

62 / 100

Public evidence score

Supplier risk intelligence with product-centric n-tier mapping, continuous monitoring of external signals, commodity risk and mitigation tracking.

Official website ↗

5 criteria not found in reviewed pages · sources reviewed 13 November 2026

SSupplier and site records16 / 20

A1Supplier registerA searchable supplier inventory with owners and contacts.Documented4/4

A2Site and facility recordsProduction sites or facilities can be recorded under a supplier.Partially documented2/4

A3Upstream tiersSuppliers beyond the direct tier can be mapped.Documented4/4

A4Spend or category segmentationSuppliers can be segmented by spend, category or material.Partially documented2/4

A5Supplier onboardingNew suppliers enter through a documented onboarding and data request.Documented4/4

RRisk assessment16 / 20

B1Human-rights risk screeningSuppliers are screened against labour and human-rights risk.Partially documented2/4

B2Environmental risk screeningSuppliers are screened against environmental and climate risk.Documented4/4

B3Country and sector contextRisk is informed by country, sector or commodity data.Documented4/4

B4Documented severity methodHow likelihood and severity are scored is published or configurable.Partially documented2/4

B5Prioritisation and next actionResults are ranked and paired with a recommended action.Documented4/4

GGrievances and remediation6 / 20

C1Grievance intakeWorkers or third parties can raise a complaint against a supplier.Not found in reviewed pages0/4

C2Anonymous channelA complaint can be submitted anonymously.Not found in reviewed pages0/4

C3Case workflow and deadlinesCases have status, ownership and response timers.Not found in reviewed pages0/4

C4Corrective action plansFindings become tracked corrective actions with owners.Documented4/4

C5Closure evidenceClosure requires evidence that the issue was remedied.Partially documented2/4

EEvidence and reporting10 / 20

D1Document collectionCertificates and policies are collected with expiry dates.Partially documented2/4

D2Supplier questionnairesStandard assessments or self-assessments can be issued.Documented4/4

D3Audit managementAudits can be commissioned, recorded and linked to findings.Not found in reviewed pages0/4

D4Statement and report exportA due-diligence statement or report can be produced.Not found in reviewed pages0/4

D5Audit trailChanges and evidence carry a traceable history.Documented4/4

CControls and oversight14 / 20

E1Regulatory mappingOutputs map to CSDDD, EUDR, forced labour or national laws.Partially documented2/4

E2Continuous monitoringSuppliers are monitored between assessments.Documented4/4

E3Integrations and APIData moves to or from procurement, ERP or other systems.Partially documented2/4

E4Security and trust pageCertifications or a public trust page are published.Partially documented2/4

E5AI disclosureThe role of AI in the product is documented.Documented4/4

Vendor pages reviewed

Open the full profile

Rank 09

Prewave

Vienna, Austria

56 / 100

Public evidence score

Supplier risk intelligence built on continuous monitoring of public signals, with multi-tier exposure and financial impact estimates.

Official website ↗

6 criteria not found in reviewed pages · sources reviewed 13 November 2026

SSupplier and site records16 / 20

A1Supplier registerA searchable supplier inventory with owners and contacts.Documented4/4

A2Site and facility recordsProduction sites or facilities can be recorded under a supplier.Partially documented2/4

A3Upstream tiersSuppliers beyond the direct tier can be mapped.Documented4/4

A4Spend or category segmentationSuppliers can be segmented by spend, category or material.Documented4/4

A5Supplier onboardingNew suppliers enter through a documented onboarding and data request.Partially documented2/4

RRisk assessment14 / 20

B1Human-rights risk screeningSuppliers are screened against labour and human-rights risk.Partially documented2/4

B2Environmental risk screeningSuppliers are screened against environmental and climate risk.Partially documented2/4

B3Country and sector contextRisk is informed by country, sector or commodity data.Documented4/4

B4Documented severity methodHow likelihood and severity are scored is published or configurable.Partially documented2/4

B5Prioritisation and next actionResults are ranked and paired with a recommended action.Documented4/4

GGrievances and remediation2 / 20

C1Grievance intakeWorkers or third parties can raise a complaint against a supplier.Not found in reviewed pages0/4

C2Anonymous channelA complaint can be submitted anonymously.Not found in reviewed pages0/4

C3Case workflow and deadlinesCases have status, ownership and response timers.Not found in reviewed pages0/4

C4Corrective action plansFindings become tracked corrective actions with owners.Partially documented2/4

C5Closure evidenceClosure requires evidence that the issue was remedied.Not found in reviewed pages0/4

EEvidence and reporting8 / 20

D1Document collectionCertificates and policies are collected with expiry dates.Partially documented2/4

D2Supplier questionnairesStandard assessments or self-assessments can be issued.Partially documented2/4

D3Audit managementAudits can be commissioned, recorded and linked to findings.Not found in reviewed pages0/4

D4Statement and report exportA due-diligence statement or report can be produced.Partially documented2/4

D5Audit trailChanges and evidence carry a traceable history.Partially documented2/4

CControls and oversight16 / 20

E1Regulatory mappingOutputs map to CSDDD, EUDR, forced labour or national laws.Documented4/4

E2Continuous monitoringSuppliers are monitored between assessments.Documented4/4

E3Integrations and APIData moves to or from procurement, ERP or other systems.Documented4/4

E4Security and trust pageCertifications or a public trust page are published.Not found in reviewed pages0/4

E5AI disclosureThe role of AI in the product is documented.Documented4/4

Vendor pages reviewed

Open the full profile

How this rating works

The score measures how much of a vendor's public evidence covers a common set of questions. It does not certify that the product meets CSDDD or that a workflow works in practice.

4 points

The reviewed vendor pages clearly document the capability.

2 points

Public evidence describes a narrower or partial version of the criterion.

0 points

The vendor says it is absent, or no supporting evidence was found. “Not found” is flagged separately.

There are 25 questions in five areas, each worth up to four points. Only public vendor product and documentation pages were reviewed. Sales demos, contracts and security packs were not examined. Features can vary by plan, region and configuration; confirm them with the vendor before procurement. No vendor pays for a listing or a rating.

Regulatory sources

Browse categories How scoring works Suggest a correctionRubric reviewed 13 November 2026