4 points
The reviewed vendor pages clearly document the capability.
Supply-chain due diligence · Rank 01
osapiens HUB
Supplier intelligence, product compliance and disclosure modules on one shared data layer, with dedicated workflows for EUDR, CSDDD and LkSG.
100 points across 25 questions · public vendor evidence
Profile overview
At a glance
Category
Supply-chain due diligence
Evidence
Public vendor pages
Not found
3 of 25 questions
Reviewed
13 November 2026
25 questions · 100 points
Criterion-by-criterion
Each question is worth four points: 4 when the reviewed pages clearly document it, 2 for narrower or partial evidence, and 0 when the vendor says it is absent or no supporting statement was found. “Not found” is marked separately from an explicit absence.
SSupplier and site records16 / 20
A1Supplier registerA searchable supplier inventory with owners and contacts.Documented4/4
A2Site and facility recordsProduction sites or facilities can be recorded under a supplier.Partially documented2/4
A3Upstream tiersSuppliers beyond the direct tier can be mapped.Documented4/4
A4Spend or category segmentationSuppliers can be segmented by spend, category or material.Partially documented2/4
A5Supplier onboardingNew suppliers enter through a documented onboarding and data request.Documented4/4
RRisk assessment18 / 20
B1Human-rights risk screeningSuppliers are screened against labour and human-rights risk.Documented4/4
B2Environmental risk screeningSuppliers are screened against environmental and climate risk.Documented4/4
B3Country and sector contextRisk is informed by country, sector or commodity data.Documented4/4
B4Documented severity methodHow likelihood and severity are scored is published or configurable.Partially documented2/4
B5Prioritisation and next actionResults are ranked and paired with a recommended action.Documented4/4
GGrievances and remediation6 / 20
C1Grievance intakeWorkers or third parties can raise a complaint against a supplier.Not found in reviewed pages0/4
C2Anonymous channelA complaint can be submitted anonymously.Not found in reviewed pages0/4
C3Case workflow and deadlinesCases have status, ownership and response timers.Not found in reviewed pages0/4
C4Corrective action plansFindings become tracked corrective actions with owners.Documented4/4
C5Closure evidenceClosure requires evidence that the issue was remedied.Partially documented2/4
EEvidence and reporting20 / 20
D1Document collectionCertificates and policies are collected with expiry dates.Documented4/4
D2Supplier questionnairesStandard assessments or self-assessments can be issued.Documented4/4
D3Audit managementAudits can be commissioned, recorded and linked to findings.Documented4/4
D4Statement and report exportA due-diligence statement or report can be produced.Documented4/4
D5Audit trailChanges and evidence carry a traceable history.Documented4/4
CControls and oversight20 / 20
E1Regulatory mappingOutputs map to CSDDD, EUDR, forced labour or national laws.Documented4/4
E2Continuous monitoringSuppliers are monitored between assessments.Documented4/4
E3Integrations and APIData moves to or from procurement, ERP or other systems.Documented4/4
E4Security and trust pageCertifications or a public trust page are published.Documented4/4
E5AI disclosureThe role of AI in the product is documented.Documented4/4
Evidence trail
Vendor pages reviewed
- 01osapiens: platform overview
- 02osapiens: Supplier Intelligence suite
- 03osapiens: EUDR regulation workflow
Only public vendor product and documentation pages were reviewed. Sales demos, contracts and security packs were not examined. Features can vary by plan, region and configuration.
Method
How this score is produced
The score measures the coverage of a vendor's public evidence against a common set of questions. It does not certify that the product meets CSDDD or that a workflow works in practice.
2 points
Public evidence describes a narrower or partial version of the criterion.
0 points
The vendor explicitly says it is absent, or no supporting evidence was found. “Not found” is flagged separately.