Skip to main content
UBSW.EU

Ethics software · requirement

Ethics platforms hosting data in the EU

Platforms that name an EU data centre for report storage, and the ones that leave the hosting location undisclosed.

See all 15 platformsSearch all platforms

Last updated 13 November 2026

8 of 15 platforms meet this requirement

Hosting location is the cheapest test of a data-sovereignty claim. A named country can be checked against the vendor's sub-processor list; a region in a marketing diagram cannot. Where a vendor offers EU residency but will not name the country, the entry records that narrower fact rather than treating it as compliance.

8

publish the fact this requirement asks for

7

do not publish it, or state it is not offered

Names an EU country for report storage

The test applied to every entry on this page.

All 15 platforms, qualifying first

The evidence column quotes the fact the decision was made from. A dash means the vendor publishes nothing either way, which is recorded as a finding rather than a gap.
PlatformHeadquartersEvidenceLanguagesScoreMeets
OneTrustNon-EUAtlanta, Georgia, United StatesEU country namedLanguages not published76/100Meets the requirement
EQS Integrity LineMunich, GermanyEU country named80 languages62/100Meets the requirement
WhistleBStockholm, SwedenEU country named60 languages60/100Meets the requirement
SpeakUpAmsterdam, NetherlandsEU country named100 languages60/100Meets the requirement
FaceUpPrague, Czech RepublicEU country named113 languages60/100Meets the requirement
WhistlelinkStockholm, SwedenEU country named50 languages64/100Meets the requirement
EthicontrolTallinn, EstoniaEU country named60 languages76/100Meets the requirement
Legality WhistleblowingCagliari, ItalyEU country named10 languages56/100Meets the requirement
NAVEXNon-EULake Oswego, Oregon, United StatesEU region, no country named60 languages74/100Does not meet the requirement
EthicoNon-EURichmond, Virginia, United StatesNot published200 languages64/100Does not meet the requirement
AllVoicesNon-EULos Angeles, California, United StatesNot publishedLanguages not published52/100Does not meet the requirement
Ethico Hotline & IntakeNon-EUCharlotte, North Carolina, United StatesNot publishedLanguages not published40/100Does not meet the requirement
Case IQNon-EUOttawa, Ontario, CanadaEU region, no country named150 languages50/100Does not meet the requirement
ResolverNon-EUToronto, Ontario, CanadaEU region, no country named60 languages62/100Does not meet the requirement
WhispliNon-EUSydney, AustraliaEU region, no country named70 languages62/100Does not meet the requirement

Shortlist by another requirement

Apply a different test

Each shortlist is derived from the same entries, so the counts cannot drift away from the data.

Ethics software with published pricing

An entry price appears on the vendor's own website.

4 of 15 platforms qualify

Ethics software you can buy without a sales call

You can open an account and evaluate the product yourself.

2 of 15 platforms qualify

ISO 27001 certified ethics platforms

A current ISO 27001 certificate is published, with scope stated.

12 of 15 platforms qualify

Ethics platforms with a conflicts-of-interest register

Conflicts declarations are collected, reviewed and retained in the product.

3 of 15 platforms qualify

Ethics platforms with a gifts and hospitality register

Gifts, hospitality and entertainment are declared and approved in the product.

2 of 15 platforms qualify

Ethics platforms with no published AI processing

Report content does not pass through a published AI feature.

12 of 15 platforms qualify

Ethics platforms that document the EU Whistleblowing Directive

Directive 2019/1937 is referenced on the product or legal pages.

10 of 15 platforms qualify

Ethics platforms with a public API

A documented API lets cases reach an existing GRC or case system.

6 of 15 platforms qualify