Ethics software · requirement
Ethics platforms that document the EU Whistleblowing Directive
Platforms that name Directive 2019/1937 or a national transposition law on their own pages, and the ones that keep the claim generic.
Last updated 13 November 2026
10 of 15 platforms meet this requirement
10
publish the fact this requirement asks for
5
do not publish it, or state it is not offered
Names Directive 2019/1937 or a national law
The test applied to every entry on this page.
All 15 platforms, qualifying first
| Platform | Headquarters | Evidence | Languages | Score | Meets |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NAVEXNon-EU | Lake Oswego, Oregon, United States | EU Directive 2019/1937 · Germany (HinSchG) · France (Sapin II) | 60 languages | 74/100 | Meets the requirement |
| OneTrustNon-EU | Atlanta, Georgia, United States | EU Directive 2019/1937 · France (Sapin II) | Languages not published | 76/100 | Meets the requirement |
| EQS Integrity Line | Munich, Germany | EU Directive 2019/1937 · Germany (HinSchG) · France (Sapin II, Waserman) · Spain (Ley 2/2023) | 80 languages | 62/100 | Meets the requirement |
| WhistleB | Stockholm, Sweden | EU Directive 2019/1937 · Germany (HinSchG) · Sweden (Lag 2021:890) | 60 languages | 60/100 | Meets the requirement |
| SpeakUp | Amsterdam, Netherlands | EU Directive 2019/1937 · Netherlands (Wbk) | 100 languages | 60/100 | Meets the requirement |
| FaceUp | Prague, Czech Republic | EU Directive 2019/1937 · Czechia (Act No. 171/2023 Coll.) | 113 languages | 60/100 | Meets the requirement |
| Whistlelink | Stockholm, Sweden | EU Directive 2019/1937 · Sweden (Lag 2021:890) | 50 languages | 64/100 | Meets the requirement |
| Ethicontrol | Tallinn, Estonia | EU Directive 2019/1937 · France (Sapin II) · United Kingdom (PIDA) | 60 languages | 76/100 | Meets the requirement |
| Legality Whistleblowing | Cagliari, Italy | EU Directive 2019/1937 · Italy (D.Lgs. 24/2023) | 10 languages | 56/100 | Meets the requirement |
| WhispliNon-EU | Sydney, Australia | EU Directive 2019/1937 · France (Sapin II) | 70 languages | 62/100 | Meets the requirement |
| EthicoNon-EU | Richmond, Virginia, United States | Directive not named | 200 languages | 64/100 | Does not meet the requirement |
| AllVoicesNon-EU | Los Angeles, California, United States | Directive not named | Languages not published | 52/100 | Does not meet the requirement |
| Ethico Hotline & IntakeNon-EU | Charlotte, North Carolina, United States | Directive not named | Languages not published | 40/100 | Does not meet the requirement |
| Case IQNon-EU | Ottawa, Ontario, Canada | Directive not named | 150 languages | 50/100 | Does not meet the requirement |
| ResolverNon-EU | Toronto, Ontario, Canada | Directive not named | 60 languages | 62/100 | Does not meet the requirement |
Shortlist by another requirement
Apply a different test
Ethics platforms hosting data in the EU
The vendor names an EU country where report data is stored.
8 of 15 platforms qualify
Ethics software with published pricing
An entry price appears on the vendor's own website.
4 of 15 platforms qualify
Ethics software you can buy without a sales call
You can open an account and evaluate the product yourself.
2 of 15 platforms qualify
ISO 27001 certified ethics platforms
A current ISO 27001 certificate is published, with scope stated.
12 of 15 platforms qualify
Ethics platforms with a conflicts-of-interest register
Conflicts declarations are collected, reviewed and retained in the product.
3 of 15 platforms qualify
Ethics platforms with a gifts and hospitality register
Gifts, hospitality and entertainment are declared and approved in the product.
2 of 15 platforms qualify
Ethics platforms with no published AI processing
Report content does not pass through a published AI feature.
12 of 15 platforms qualify
Ethics platforms with a public API
A documented API lets cases reach an existing GRC or case system.
6 of 15 platforms qualify